rCBDC to be Launched in Hong Kong, e-HKD, Has Adoption Methods Analysed in Newest Whitepaper


In April, the Hong Kong Financial Authority (HKMA) issued a dialogue paper titled “e-HKD: A coverage and design perspective” (the “Paper”), inviting views from the general public and the business on key coverage and design points for introducing retail central financial institution digital foreign money (rCBDC), i.e. e-HKD, in Hong Kong.

After saying the “Fintech 2025” technique in June 2021, the HKMA began a undertaking to review the prospect of introducing the e-HKD in Hong Kong. The preliminary findings of the primary a part of the research, which centered on the technical facet, had been printed in October 2021 within the type of a technical whitepaper for feedback.

The second a part of the research centered on the coverage and design elements of introducing the e-HKD, and the preliminary findings of that are set out within the Paper.  The problems examined within the research embrace the potential advantages and challenges, design issues akin to issuance mechanism, interoperability with different cost programs, privateness and information safety and authorized issues, in addition to use circumstances. To facilitate stakeholders in sharing their views, the HKMA has highlighted the problems for remark within the type of twelve dialogue questions within the Paper.

Eddie Yue, chief govt of the HKMA, stated, “This Paper marks one other milestone in our exploration for the e-HKD. The coverage and design issues set out within the paper have mirrored newest worldwide developments in addition to the distinctive options of the monetary market of Hong Kong. We strongly encourage the general public and the business to participate on this necessary session and share their views with us. The feedback acquired would assist us formulate the technique for finest positioning our monetary market within the quickly evolving rCBDC area.”

Among the professionals of e-HKD talked about within the Paper embrace how its functionalities and attributes may place Hong Kong for the challenges of other models of account (i.e.stablecoins) dominating town, despite the fact that such a risk stays distant. The potential programmability facet of e-HKD may additionally allow modern purposes like good contracts, offered that the related challenges (e.g. programme glitches) are correctly addressed.

Cons arose within the Paper too: Whereas e-HKD may present an alternate cost methodology, a widespread prevalence of e-HKD on the expense of bodily money may very well render the cost system extra susceptible to cyberattacks and energy/community outages, in addition to create a notion of intensifying competitors within the retail cost panorama, despite the fact that it isn’t the target of introducing e-HKD. The rise of cryptocurrencies has been met with an equal rise in fraudsters – the affect that cybercrime may have cannot be understated.

The Paper additionally mentions how there’s a concern that potential holders’ switching from deposit to e-HKD may result in financial institution disintermediation particularly throughout a monetary disaster interval, adversely affecting banks’ funding and their capability to provide credit score, the run danger for banks in Hong Kong can be very low in any case, given depositors’ confidence within the Deposit Safety Scheme and the HKMA’s prudential rules and oversight. Acceptable design decisions (i.e. unremunerated vs. remunerated) and sufficient safeguards (e.g. most account steadiness) may assist handle the danger, although additional in-depth issues can be required as an excessively restrictive scheme may discourage potential customers of e-HKD.

  • Francis is a junior journalist with a BA in Classical Civilization, he has a specialist curiosity in North and South America.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.